An economical heating system is a source of huge benefits for the household budget. Did you know that as much as 60% of the energy used during the operation of a building is consumed by its heating? It is therefore not surprising that most people are looking for alternative energy sources that will allow them to reduce their expenses. More and more often energy-efficient houses are being built in our country, which are characterized by lower heat demand than traditional houses. What is the best way to heat it to make it cheap, warm and healthy?
When choosing an energy-efficient heating system for a house, it is necessary to take into account not only economic aspects, but also health aspects in the context of residents and ecological aspects related to the natural environment. The house will not only be energy-efficient, but also ecological.
Heating an energy-efficient house does not have to differ from the system in traditional buildings. However, the difference is due to lower energy demand, which certainly translates into greater financial savings. You can opt for an oil or gas stove, which in the modern version is practically maintenance-free. There is also no risk of carbon monoxide poisoning, which is why they are considered safe and relatively environmentally friendly.
However, it is worth opting for a condensing boiler, which consumes less gas than a traditional boiler using the same fuel. The heat recovered from water vapour can be as high as 110%. These devices are highly efficient and easy to use.
A heating system that is no longer a novelty in our country, although it is still installed relatively rarely. One of the ways to heat an energy-efficient house is a heat pump, which works well both for heating rooms and tap water. In addition, it can be used to cool interiors in the summer season. Heat pumps use energy that can come from various sources – water, air and ground. It is a renewable and, what’s more, free source of energy, which translates into benefits for the environment and our wallet. However, in order for the device to work, it must be powered by electricity, but its consumption is low. The cheapest option is an air heat pump and it does not need a lower energy source to work. Their disadvantage is lower efficiency compared to ground and water pumps. If you want to opt for a water pump, you need to know that you will need access to a high-capacity aquifer. The disadvantages of both solutions have made a ground source heat pump the best choice, which does not require access to an aquifer, while the device itself is characterized by high efficiency and efficiency.
This is possible thanks to the recuperator, which has been used in passive houses. But why not use it in an energy-efficient building as well? The recuperator is able to recover as much as 80% of the exhaust heat from inside the building. The result is not only high thermal comfort, but also significant energy and thus cost savings. A ground heat exchanger supports its operation, thanks to which the air can be heated by up to 20°C in winter.
Energy-efficient houses are an investment in savings. However, in order to make them as large as possible, it is worth analyzing the capabilities of various heating systems , focusing primarily on the heating power demand of a specific building.